By Chad Smart
@chadsmart & @my123cents on Twitter
So far this year, my attempts
to blog more haven’t been that successful. Really need to get Kevin to let me
appear on the My 1-2-3 Cents podcast (part of the Jittery Monkey network and
available on iTunes) more so I can share the thoughts I have trouble getting
motivated to write about. But as we’re
now on the Road to Wrestlemania, it’s about time I start writing about how I
feel Wrestlemania 31 could go down as the least exciting Mania since 11.
Based on what has been
announced so far for Wrestlemania 31 and on one match which hasn’t been
confirmed but gets a weekly build on RAW and Smackdown, I think it’s safe to
say the three top matches are the epitome of WWE’s lack of forward thinking and
dismal storytelling. Not to mention that of the six competitors in these
matches, only three are on TV on a weekly basis and after Wrestlemania, unless
something changes, only two of the wrestlers will be wrestling on a regular
basis. Let’s take a look at these three matches and let me explain why none of
them interest me.
 |
| Not official |
Bray Wyatt vs. The Undertaker: While this match hasn’t officially been
announced, if it doesn’t happen, WWE has wasted a lot of airtime for nothing.
While the idea of The Undertaker being challenged by Bray and actually passing
the torch, or supernatural powers, to the next generation may look good on
paper, the intrigue of this match is hampered by Undertaker’s lost to Brock
Lesnar at Wrestlemania XXX.
Without “The
Streak,” what interest is there in The Undertaker’s once a year appearance?
Even with “The Streak,” I had grown tired of Taker’s yearly Wrestlemania match
since Wrestlemania 25. Each match followed the same formula and held so little
suspense that I wasn’t even paying attention to the match with Brock Lesnar
when Lesnar pinned Taker.
Now that Taker has a 1 in the
loss column, what does it matter if he wins again at Wrestlemania? If Bray were
to beat Taker, would it tarnish “The Streak” even more to have two losses in
consecutive years? Given how Taker looked last year, and how Bray has been saying
Taker has one foot in the grave already, would it really be that big of an
accomplishment to beat The Undertaker? Or if Bray loses, will it do more harm
to Bray in the long run that he wasn’t able to beat a geriatric, half dead Phenom? Hindsight being 20/20, this match either
should have happened last year with Bray ending the streak and becoming the new
Lord of Darkness, or Taker should have beat Brock. As it stands now, instead of
being a meaningful match, this is just another not even part-time wrestler
getting a match at Wrestlemania due to his legacy. I see this as a no win situation for either
wrestler and will do little to build for the future of WWE.
Sting vs. Triple H: Long time readers know I wasn’t impressed
with the way Sting arrived in WWE. If the storyline for this match is the best
that WWE Creative could come up with then it’s time to get a whole new creative
team. I have no problem with Sting being in WWE. I have no problem with Sting
wrestling at Wrestlemania. In all honesty, seeing Sting at Wrestlemania is the
biggest reason I’d be interested in going to Wrestlemania 31. But seeing Sting
battle Triple H over the death of WCW is not something I care to see in
2015. If Sting is so upset over WWE
buying WCW why did he wait 14 years to show up?
After all the power plays done by Vince McMahon, Stephanie McMahon and
Triple H over the past 14 years, why did Sting decide November 2014 to be the
time to stand up to The Authority? These
are questions that would be nice to get answers to but since Sting has only
showed up three times so far and hasn’t uttered as much as a Stinger yell, I
still don’t know why Sting is in WWE.
Kevin and I have discussed
Sting being in WWE before and I also have the same comment. Having Sting’s
first match at Wrestlemania is a no win situation. Well, actually that was when
the general consensus was Sting would be facing The Undertaker. The only
advantage I can see of having Sting face Hunter is if Sting wins he’s not
breaking “The Streak” or beating a younger talent who could use the win. If
Sting loses, then Sting becomes just another WCW reject in the eyes of WWE fans
as someone who wasn’t good enough to be in WWE.
Seriously though, 14 years after the demise of WCW and NOW Sting shows
up?
Brock Lesnar vs. Roman Reigns: I don’t know if I even need to write anything
about this one. Reigns has been put into a position he’s not ready for and if
he fails it’s not his fault. Hopefully I’m wrong and Reigns will be a credible
main eventer. After only two and a half years in WWE, I believe Reigns will be
the fastest person to win the WWE title after only Brock Lesnar. The difference
is Brock has the aura about him that screams badass. Reigns does not exude that
persona.
I’ll admit I’m also one of
the people who felt a Lesnar vs. Daniel Bryan match made more sense from a
storytelling perspective and would have made for a more compelling David vs.
Goliath match.
While I accept someone in WWE apparently doesn’t view Daniel
Bryan in the same regards as the fans, I still question the judgment to push
Roman Reigns to the top so quickly. Sadly, the only interest I have in this
match is to see how the fans react. Given the overall snarkiness of the typical
Wrestlemania crowd, I can see this being a rehash of the Goldberg/Lesnar match
from Wrestlemania XX.
These are the top three
matches for Wrestlemania 31. Why WWE feels the need to bring in part time
wrestlers to fill out the major spots in the show baffles me. Not to mention
that most of the rest of the roster is being put into one of two matches. The
“name” talent is going into the Not-MITB Ladder match and the “not taken
seriously” talent is going into the Andre the Giant Battle Royal. What happens
in 3-4 years when WWE runs out of part time talent to bring back? Who is going
to be the selling point for Wrestlemania then? This is a serious question and
one I would hope WWE would answer before it gets to that point.
Does the use of part timers
make you more or less interested in Wrestlemania? Share your thoughts on the
My 1-2-3 Cents Facebook page, or tweet us @my123cents.